Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41272788›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2025

Family refusal rates for organ donation after brain death and after circulatory death: a single-center 6-year experience.

Federica De Min, Maria Assunta Donato, Elisa Raimondo, Alessandro Ivan De Martino, Alessia Bresil, Alessandra Agnese Grossi, Martina Baiardo Redaelli, Paolo Severgnini, Luca Cabrini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Refusal Rates in Different Types of Deceased Donors.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Federica De MinGeneral and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Units, Circolo Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Maria Assunta DonatoGeneral and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Units, Circolo Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Elisa RaimondoGeneral and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Units, Circolo Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Alessandro Ivan De MartinoGeneral and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Units, Circolo Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Alessia BresilGeneral and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Units, Circolo Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Alessandra Agnese GrossiDepartment of Human Sciences, Innovation and Territory, University of Insubria, Varese-Como, Italy.
Martina Baiardo RedaelliGeneral and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Units, Circolo Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy. m.baiardoredaelli@gmail.com.
Paolo SevergniniDepartment of Biotechnologies and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese-Como, Italy.
Luca CabriniGeneral and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Units, Circolo Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA wide gap exists between the number of patients awaiting organ transplantation and the availability of donor organs. For most vital organs, no artificial substitutes are available, resulting in the death of approximately 3-4% of patients on transplant waiting lists. Deceased organ donation occurs through one of two pathways: donation after brain death (DBD) or after controlled circulatory death (cDCD). In the absence of documented consent during the patient's lifetime, many countries rely on family members to make the decision, placing an emotional burden on them during a time of acute grief. Data on family attitudes toward organ donation, particularly in relation to the mode of death (DBD vs. cDCD), remains limited. This study aimed to examine the frequency of family refusal in the context of deceased organ donation and assess whether it differs between DBD and cDCD cases.

methodsThis retrospective, single-center observational study analyzed 6 years of hospital data (2019-2024) from five intensive care units at a tertiary university hospital in Varese, Italy. All patients, regardless of age, who were eligible for deceased organ donation through either DBD or cDCD were included.

resultsA total of 158 patients were evaluated for donation (135 DBD; 23 cDCD). Documented opt-in consent, as recorded in the national donor registry, was available for 41 patients (20%), while 3 had registered their refusal. Two patients were ineligible for donation; for the remaining 112 patients (71%), consent was sought from family members. Family refusal occurred in 28 cases (25% of the 112 families asked for consent). No significant difference in consent rates was observed between DBD and cDCD pathways (DBD: 73/98 vs. cDCD: 11/14; p = 0.74).

conclusionsFamily refusal was the leading reason for missed donation opportunities among patients without documented opt-in consent, accounting for one in four cases. The donation pathway (DBD vs. cDCD) did not significantly influence family decision-making. Given ongoing organ shortages and high wait-list mortality, strategies are needed to support family decisions and to promote the formal registration of opt-in consent among citizens.

Indexed as

EthicsIntensive careOrgan donationTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID41272788
PMCPMC12639733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.