ArticleReproductive health2025
"It's not about a question, it's about the outcomes, isn't it?": pilot study for Scottish pregnancy screening tool provision of preconception health care in Scotland.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPregnancy intention is not routinely asked about in most primary care settings, leading to missed opportunities for timely discussions about contraception or preconception care. This study evaluated a Scottish adaptation of the One Key Question® (OKQ®) screening tool, designed to prompt conversations about pregnancy desire with women of reproductive age.
methodsThe pilot was implemented in two GP practices in Scotland. All women aged 16 and over with the capacity to become pregnant were eligible to be asked the question, regardless of the reason for their visit. Information, services, or referrals were then offered based on their response. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to evaluate acceptability from the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) over a 3-month period.
resultsFifty-six women were asked the pregnancy intention question from October to December 2024. Thirty-eight (68%) provided feedback. Most found the conversation easy (92%) and felt listened to and supported (94%). Six HCPs were interviewed at the end of the pilot; they described the tool as a useful prompt, with contraception the most common outcome. However, some reported uncertainty about when it was appropriate to ask.
conclusionThis pilot suggests that using a standardised pregnancy intention question may be a simple and acceptable way to initiate reproductive health conversations in routine care. The findings also highlight the need for flexible and sensitive use depending on patient context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.