ArticleBMC medical education2025
Program evaluation of an urban community diagnosis program incorporating fieldwork using a realist approach.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping the evidence on public health competency assessment strategies in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding social determinants of health is essential for medical education, particularly in complex urban settings. This study evaluated a fieldwork-based community diagnosis program designed to help medical students identify community health issues, appreciate diverse social contexts, and integrate theoretical frameworks into practical learning.
methodsThe program was integrated into a two-week general medicine clerkship at X Medical School in Tokyo in 2022-2023. It included an orientation on ecological systems theory and phenomenological reduction, followed by urban fieldwork, student presentations, peer and faculty feedback, and a final report. A realist approach using Context-Mechanism-Outcome (CMO) framework guided the evaluation, focusing on how contextual factors influenced learning mechanisms to produce specific outcomes. Data sources included students' reports, reflective writings, and feedback session transcripts. Qualitative analysis was conducted to identify patterns of learning and interaction. Students' understanding of community health and ability to apply theoretical models were assessed using structured rubrics.
resultsThe program significantly improved students' ability to observe, analyze, and interpret complex urban community dynamics. Orientation sessions helped students overcome theory-laden biases and expand their observational skills. Fieldwork, coupled with iterative feedback, facilitated double-loop learning, enabling students to reassess assumptions and refine their perspectives. Positionality theory encouraged reflection on power dynamics, leading students to critically examine implicit biases and understand the perspectives of marginalized populations. Through phenomenological reduction, students recognized biases in their biomedical training and shifted toward a holistic understanding of community health, encompassing ecological and social determinants. Peer and faculty feedback promoted intersubjectivity, allowing students to develop a layered appreciation of urban diversity and social complexity. Students reported an increased ability to connect theoretical knowledge with real-world health disparities, proposing actionable, sustainable interventions for urban communities.
conclusionsThis realist approach demonstrated that integrating fieldwork with reflective learning and theory-based frameworks can foster transformative educational experiences. The findings highlight the importance of incorporating community-based programs into medical curricula to prepare future physicians to address health disparities and complex social determinants effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.