ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2025
Peptide nucleic acid (PNA) clamps enhance root microbiome profiling in wheat and maize.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeptide Nucleic Acid (PNA) clamps represent a crucial molecular tool for reducing host DNA contamination during plant tissue microbiome profiling. This is particularly important when there is sequence similarity between the host organellar DNA (e.g., mitochondrial) and the targeted PCR sequences. However, the effectiveness and optimal concentration of universal PNA clamps can vary between plant species, necessitating a case-by-case evaluation. Here, we assessed the effectiveness of five concentrations (0.0, 0.25, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 µM) of mitochondrial and chloroplast PNA blockers (mPNA and pPNA) in reducing the amplification of organellar DNA and enhancing the profiling of prokaryotic communities across root tissues from 34 maize and 27 wheat samples cultivated under various soil and climatic conditions.
resultsWe observed that host plant contamination in root samples was consistently high, with an average rate exceeding 95% across all samples. The application of PNA clamps significantly reduced plant host contamination by 2.4-27.2 times in a concentration-dependent manner. This reduction was more pronounced in maize samples than in wheat samples, particularly at lower doses (PNA ≤ 1.0 µM). PNA clamps also increased the read abundance of more than half of the observed microbiome phyla in the root tissues. The most substantial increase in prokaryotic read abundance was observed at a PNA concentration of 1.0 µM, without introducing significant bias to the prokaryotic community.
conclusionsIn conclusion, the introduction of universal PNA clamps during PCR assays significantly reduced amplification of host contamination and enhanced the detection of low-abundance microbiome and the depth of microbial profiling in both maize and wheat root tissues, with effects being concentration- and crop-specific.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.