ArticleDiagnostic pathology2025
Prognostic value of manual and digital PD-L1 expression in pT3 and pT4 colon cancer.
Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tumor-cell PD-L1 expression, mismatch repair status, and survival outcomes in colorectal carcinoma: a retrospective Pakistani cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProgrammed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a prognostic marker in several malignancies, but the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in colorectal cancer (CRC) is inconclusive. Lack of standardized scoring systems for PD-L1 evaluation in CRC has led to inconsistent findings. This exploratory study aimed to evaluate PD-L1 expression using manual and digital methods and correlate the results to overall survival (OS) in a cohort of patients with pT3 and pT4 colon cancer (CC).
methodsFrom a previously published study, 162 patients with pT3 and pT4 CC were included. One tumor slide representing the invasive margin was selected and stained for PD-L1 (22C3). PD-L1 was evaluated according to the tumor proportion score (TPS), the immune cell score (ICS), and the combined positive score (CPS). Additionally, a digital algorithm for detecting PD-L1 positive cells was developed. The manual and digital PD-L1 expression scores were correlated to OS in the entire cohort, and in subgroups according to mismatch repair (MMR) status.
resultsOnly 1 case was classified with a TPS of ≥ 1%. The ICS was classified as < 1%, 1-9%, and ≥ 10% in 66%, 30.2% and 3.7% of the tumors, respectively. The CPS was classified as < 1, 1-9, and ≥ 10 in 82.7%, 15.4%, and 1.9% of the tumors, respectively. A high digital PD-L1 expression score was an independent prognostic factor for longer OS, adjusted for age, pT-category and adjuvant chemotherapy (aHR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.19-0.86, p = 0.018). In the pMMR subgroup, both a CPS ≥ 1 and a high digital score were significantly associated with longer OS in the multivariate analyses (aHR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.06-0.99, p = 0.049, and aHR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.12-0.97, p = 0.043, respectively).
conclusionsOur results suggest that high PD-L1 expression is associated with longer OS. In future studies examining PD-L1 expression as a prognostic biomarker in CC, assessing PD-L1 expression using a digital approach or the CPS can be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.