ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Bridging pharmacovigilance and genetic insight: investigating drugs and indications for breast cancer risk in women with autoimmune diseases.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWomen with autoimmune diseases (AIDs) experience chronic immune dysregulation and hormonal fluctuations, both of which may influence breast cancer risk. However, it remains unclear whether this risk is driven mainly by its treatment or the underlying disease, highlighting the need for integrating real-world data and genetic evidence.
methodsThe FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) were utilized to identify breast cancer safety signals among women with AIDs, analyzing 11,479 reports from 2004 to 2024. Disproportionality analyses using Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Information Component (IC) were conducted. Then, we mapped these drugs to their target genes and performed mendelian randomization (MR) to assess their causal relationships with breast cancer. Finally, we investigated shared genetic architecture between breast cancer and AIDs using global and local genetic correlation, cross-trait meta-analysis, and transcriptome-wide association studies.
resultsWe identified 13 immunosuppressive drugs (TNF inhibitors, interleukin inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies), 3 immunostimulants and 16 adjunctive drugs associated with increased breast cancer reporting in patients with AIDs. The drugs with the highest case reports for positive disproportionality analysis were interferon beta-1a (N: 1731, IC [IC025] 1.56 [1.49]), natalizumab (798, 0.65 [0.54]), and infliximab (741, 0.64 [0.53]). MR results revealed causal links between 9 drug targets and breast cancer risk, such as FDPS (OR: 0.66, p: 1.33E-08), CALCRL (OR: 0.887, p: 4.77E-06) and PARP1 (OR: 1.051, p: 3.50E-06). Global genetic correlation identified significant shared heritability between breast cancer and 3 specific AIDs, including type 1 diabetes mellitus (rg: -0.242, p: 0.95E-4), ulcerative colitis (rg: 0.125, p: 0.29E-2), and migraine (rg: 0.078, p: 0.79E-2). Specifically, the most notable genetic overlap was observed between breast cancer and type 1 diabetes mellitus, with significant shared risk SNPs (rs12046289 and rs6679677) and susceptibility genes (ADCY3 and CENPO).
conclusionsOur study uncovered several immune-related drugs associated with increased breast cancer reporting in women with AIDs. This risk may be explained by several potential drug targets with causal roles, or by the shared genetic comorbidity between specific AIDs and breast cancer. These insights emphasize the need for tailored breast cancer surveillance and highlight potential molecular targets for intervention in vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.