Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41272698›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2025

A systematic meta-review of interventions to prevent and manage delirium in the Intensive Care Unit: Part 2 - Non-pharmacological and multicomponent interventions.

Burak Kundakci, Katherine L Jones, Andrew Booth, Louise Falzon, Maria Pufulete, Ben Gibbison, OPTIC consortium

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Autoimmune Encephalitis in Acute Care-Pathology, Diagnosis, and Management.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Burak KundakciSchool of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Katherine L JonesSchool of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Andrew BoothSchool of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Louise FalzonSchool of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Maria PufuleteBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Ben GibbisonBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. ben.gibbison@bristol.ac.uk.
OPTIC consortium

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR204591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive Care Unit (ICU) delirium is a multifactorial syndrome associated with prolonged hospitalisation, increased morbidity and mortality, cognitive decline, and higher healthcare costs. Prevention and management of delirium have to date included both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Many of these interventions have been combined in systematic reviews. This systematic meta-review (Part 2) reviews, details and analyses non-pharmacological and multicomponent interventions to prevent and manage ICU delirium.

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted across eight databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science) from their inception until 8th August 2025. Eligible reviews included critically ill adults in ICU settings and examined the effectiveness of non-pharmacological and multi-component interventions on delirium occurrence, mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS) and other core outcomes. Reviews were assessed for quality using a framework of methodological interpretation of review conduct and reporting.

resultsThirty-two systematic review and meta-analyses including 335 single studies assessing 16 non-pharmacological interventions were included. The ABCDEF bundle and other multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions and early mobilization significantly reduced delirium incidence and duration. Family participation in care was also reported to reduce delirium incidence. Mortality benefits were reported in studies of multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions. The evidence was inconsistent and often of low quality.

conclusionsWhile some non-pharmacological interventions (multi-component care packages, early mobilization and family-based interventions) show potential to reduce delirium occurrence and duration, multicomponent strategies, particularly those including early mobilization and family participation, appear more effective.

Indexed as

DeliriumHumansIntensive Care UnitsAdult intensive and critical careCare-bundleCare-package non-pharmacological interventionDeliriumReview of systematic reviews.

Identifiers

PMID41272698
PMCPMC12639998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.