Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41272694›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

A mixed methods protocol for a framework to improve access to radiotherapy services for cancer patients in Gauteng Province, South Africa.

Portia N Ramashia, Pauline B Nkosi, Sheynaz Bassa, Thokozani P Mbonane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Portia N RamashiaDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, 2000, South Africa. pramashia@uj.ac.za.
Pauline B NkosiFaculty of Health Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban, 4000, South Africa.
Sheynaz BassaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Steve Biko Academic Hospital (SBAH), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa.
Thokozani P MbonaneDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, 2000, South Africa.

Funding

National Research Foundation of South Africa NFSG23031582533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer is a burden on public health worldwide, with its prevalence and mortality continually rising. Radiotherapy, a commonly used modality for the management of cancer, can be used alone or adjuvantly with other cancer treatment modalities for radical and palliative care. However, access to radiotherapy cancer care remained a challenge in many low- and middle-income countries, including South Africa, due to a shortage of equipment, trained personnel, and limited financial resources. This resulted in long waiting times and poor treatment outcomes. A comprehensive strategic framework is being developed to address these issues and improve overall access to radiotherapy for cancer patients in the region. This protocol was for a research study that aimed to develop a strategic framework encompassing policy reforms, infrastructure development, capacity building, and technology integration to enhance access to radiotherapy for cancer patients in Gauteng.

methodsThe study employed a concurrent triangulation mixed methods approach to address the four research objectives, namely: Objective 1: To quantify the current effectiveness of radiotherapy treatment delivery; Objective 2: To assess the socio-economic parameters and demographics that govern access to radiotherapy services for cancer patients in Gauteng Province, South Africa; Objective 3: To explore radiotherapy quality indicators and their impact on patient outcomes, and Objective 4: Based on objectives 1 to 3, develop a practical framework that provides a roadmap for enhancing access to radiotherapy services in Gauteng. Quantitative data (Objectives 1 & 3a) was analysed using IBM SPSS software, while qualitative data (Objectives 2 & 3b) was analysed using ATLAS.ti version 23 through thematic content analysis. Ethical considerations were observed throughout the study. DISCUSSION: The research has the potential to improve access to radiotherapy services. The developed framework will be valuable for policymakers, healthcare providers, and stakeholders in planning and implementing interventions addressing the identified barriers. Enhanced access to radiotherapy services will lead to timely treatment and improved outcomes for cancer patients.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityNeoplasmsHumansQuality ImprovementSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID41272694
PMCPMC12639901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.