ArticleBMC health services research2025
Perspectives of healthcare professionals regarding support following adverse events in three public hospitals in Gauteng: two sides of the coin.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to explore and describe the perceptions of support among healthcare professionals (HCPs) following adverse event involvement in three public hospitals in Gauteng, South Africa.
backgroundThe impact of adverse events on HCPs remains an underestimated health concern that warrants further attention to enable continued care for patients and successful careers after events. Experiences are magnified by unsupportive work environments, and are evident in increased hostility, blaming, fear of punishment, and reputational harm. While these HCPs require support to enable them to recover and learn from their involvement, the resources provided by healthcare organizations are varied and often inadequate. There is limited comprehension of the support needed by the HCP following involvement in adverse events.
methodsA qualitative, exploratory, descriptive, and contextual research design was used. A total of 16 nurses and 12 managers from the public hospitals were purposively selected. Data was collected by means of semi-structured interviews which were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data was analysed using thematic analysis [1].
resultsThe results revealed that there are variations regarding what was perceived as support from the healthcare professionals involved and the managers. The participants revealed that hospitals have no structures in place, others affirmed unstructured and unsystematic support. However, the managers confirmed otherwise stating the availability of required support, and citing the services were custom made for the patients involved and their relatives.
conclusionThis study provides better understanding of the perspectives of HCP regarding following adverse events in three public hospitals in Gauteng.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.