ArticleBMC public health2025
Assessment of the implementation level of the physical education program in junior high schools in Huaibei city, China, and analysis of influencing factors.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe school physical education program is an important factor in improving students’ physical fitness. In China, secondary school students’ physical fitness is facing a lot of problems, and in order to improve students’ physical fitness, the quality of the implementation of the physical education program by the school should be ensured, so it is necessary to investigate the current status of the implementation of the physical education program by junior high school schools in China, and to analyze the dimensions in which schools with high levels of implementation are better than others, so as to provide a reference for other levels of implementation to better improve the physical fitness of students.
methodsA questionnaire was used to assess the physical education implementation levels of 47 schools in the city, covering 10 dimensions. ANOVA was used to compare the differences in the dimensions among schools of different levels, and multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore the influence of each dimension on the implementation level.
resultsThe implementation level of physical education in junior high schools in the city was characterized by a distribution with more in the middle and less at the ends, and the high-level schools were significantly better than the low-level schools in several dimensions. Regression analysis showed that only campus physical activities (β = 0.058, t = 2.616, p = 0.013) and teacher team (β = 0.080, t = 3.331, p = 0.002) had a significant positive predictive effect on the implementation level.
conclusioncampus physical activities and teacher team development are the key players in improving the implementation level of physical education. It is recommended that education departments prioritize the strengthening of these two aspects, while paying attention to inter-school differences and promoting the balanced development of regional physical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.