Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41272624›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Telemedicine literacy: an explanatory sequential mixed-method inquiry into awareness and experiences of medical students and clinicians in Islamabad.

Memoona Mansoor, Amara Butt, Rehmah Sarfraz, Shazia Imran, Amena Masrur, Mohsin Raza Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Memoona MansoorDepartment of Medical Education, Islamabad Medical and Dental College, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, Pakistan. docmemoona@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9150-9563
Amara ButtRawal Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS), Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4278-8498
Rehmah SarfrazIslamabad Medical and Dental College, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0227-6217
Shazia ImranNUST School of Health Sciences (NSHS), National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8385-7568
Amena MasrurAkbar Niazi Teaching Hospital, Islamabad Medical and Dental College, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1887-4702
Mohsin Raza KhanFederal Medical College (FMC), Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3074-0340

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelemedicine services encompass a diverse range of fields, including telenursing, telepharmacy, telerehabilitation, teleradiology, telepsychiatry, and others. Despite these advancements, low-income countries still lag in telemedicine adoption. The study aimed to assess the knowledge of telemedicine among students and clinicians while gaining deeper insights into clinicians' experiences-how telemedicine has influenced their practice, the challenges they face, and the opportunities it holds for a resource-limited country like Pakistan.

methodsThis study followed an explanatory sequential design. Participants were medical professionals, including MBBS students and clinicians (House Officers, Postgraduate Trainees, and Consultants) across three medical institutions: Islamabad Medical and Dental College (IMDC), NUST School of Health Sciences (NSHS), and Rawal Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS). Quantitative data from 5-point Likert scale questionnaires were analysed using IBM SPSS (version 21) with mean and standard deviation for interpretation. Qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews with telemedicine clinicians, guided by an interview guide, were analysed through coding, categorisation, memo analysis, and consensus building of audio recordings.

resultsA total of 817 students, 23 house officers, and 26 clinicians participated in the study. Students exhibited lower familiarity (mean 2.00 ± 1.03) and knowledge (mean 1.87 ± 0.99) of telemedicine compared to house officers (mean 3.08 ± 0.848 and 2.86 ± 0.86, respectively) and clinicians (mean 2.81 ± 0.93 and 2.69 ± 1.01, respectively). The Kruskal-Wallis H test revealed a significant difference in overall scores across the three groups (p < 0.001), with students scoring distinctly lower (mean rank = 423.47) than house officers (mean rank = 615.70) and clinicians (mean rank = 587.47). The analysis of interviews led to the discovery of six themes: Clinical limitations, ethical and legal concerns, resource barriers, patient-related factors, future of telemedicine, and advantages of Telemedicine.

conclusionThe study highlights a significant knowledge gap in telemedicine, particularly among students, underscoring the need for enhanced education and training in medical curricula. While clinicians demonstrate a better understanding and more positive perceptions, telemedicine's growing importance in modern healthcare highlights the urgency for infrastructure development and policy support to facilitate its integration.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyStudents, MedicalTelemedicineAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePakistanQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesMedical CurriculumMedical EducationResource-limited countryTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41272624
PMCPMC12639904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.