ArticleBMC urology2025
Outcomes and predictors of postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: a retrospective analysis.
Article in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU) is an effective option for managing large or impacted ureteral stones when other minimally invasive treatments are not feasible. However, data on outcomes and predictors of recovery after LU remain limited.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 40 patients who underwent LU at a single center. Clinical features, perioperative parameters, and outcomes were analyzed to identify predictors of prolonged hospitalization and postoperative pain.
resultsAll patients achieved stone-free status, and no major intraoperative complications occurred. The mean hospital stay was 4.6 ± 3.5 days. Multivariate analysis showed that postoperative fever (p = 0.002), prior percutaneous nephrostomy drainage (PCND) (p = 0.009), and longer operative time (p = 0.048) independently predicted prolonged hospitalization. Severe postoperative pain was more likely in patients with preoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) (p = 0.015) and in those treated with the transperitoneal approach compared with the retroperitoneal approach (p = 0.022).
conclusionsLU provides excellent stone clearance with minimal complications. Preoperative factors such as PCND and AKI, along with intraoperative choices like surgical approach, influence recovery outcomes. Identifying these predictors may guide perioperative management in LU.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.