ArticleBMC cancer2025
Plasma-based next generation sequencing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): significance in diagnosis and treatment in Asian patients.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Multicenter Investigation of Minimally Invasive Sample Processing and the Pre-Analytic Assessment of NSCLC Small Biopsy Specimens for Molecular Testing.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
NGS is recommended by NCCN and ESMO in evaluation of advanced NSCLC prior to treatment as being eligible for target therapy has important treatment implications. However, up to 20% of tissue biopsies are insufficient to run molecular testing for all nine FDA approved biomarkers. Currently, major guidelines recommend in the metastatic treatment naïve setting to pursue first line plasma-based NGS only if there is insufficient tissue. In our retrospective cohort, it was found that in 43 patients who underwent first line plasma-based and tissue NGS, 22 were Asians. Eleven of the twenty-two (50%) patients had an actionable mutation. The overwhelming majority of those mutations were EGFR actionable mutation (81.8%). All EGFR actionable mutations found on tissue was seen on plasma-based NGS, but 2 EGFR actionable mutation were seen on plasma-based NGS only. 22.2% of EGFR actionable mutations would have been missed if tissue-based NGS was pursued alone in the first line. In addition, in both plasma-based and tissue NGS, there is a statistically significant higher chance of detecting an EGFR actionable mutation if you were Asian compared to White (P = 0.004) or a nonsmoker compared to a smoker (P = 0.017). A small number of patients were found to have an EGFR actionable mutation on plasma-based NGS but not tissue NGS despite sufficient tissue to run NGS. They derived varying degrees of benefit from targeted therapy. Based on these findings patients who are Asian or nonsmoker plasma-based NGS should be considered in the diagnostic setting even if there is sufficient tissue for NGS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.