ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
The effectiveness of a multi-dimensional intervention model combining cognitive behavioral therapy and social support in hospitalized depressed patients.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDepression management in hospitalized patients with moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder (MDD) often relies on pharmacotherapy, with limited integration of psychosocial interventions. This study introduces a novel multidimensional model combining cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and structured social support, addressing a critical gap in inpatient care.
methodsThis single-center retrospective cohort study included 212 inpatients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe MDD between November 2023 and December 2024. Patients were assigned to either routine care (n = 104) or an intervention group (n = 108) receiving CBT and a structured, multi-level social support program in addition to standard treatment. The intervention included biweekly CBT sessions, family involvement, peer support, enhanced nurse-patient communication, and post-discharge follow-up. Depression (HAMD, PHQ-9), anxiety (HAMA), social support (MSPSS), suicidal ideation (BSI), quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF), and patient satisfaction were assessed at baseline, discharge, and at two and four weeks post-discharge.
resultsA total of 212 patients were included. Compared with routine care, the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements in depressive symptoms (HAMD at 4 weeks: 12.1 vs. 16.0, p < 0.001; PHQ-9: 8.8 vs. 12.4, p < 0.001), anxiety, social support, suicidal ideation, and quality of life (all p < 0.001). Social support was negatively correlated with depression severity, and the intervention (OR = 2.45) and good sleep quality (OR = 1.89) were independent predictors of treatment response. Sensitivity analyses confirmed results robustness.
conclusionThis novel integration of CBT and structured social support significantly enhances clinical outcomes and reduces suicide risk in hospitalized patients with depression, offering a scalable, patient-centered model. However, the retrospective design limits causal inferences, requiring prospective studies for validation. Its standardized design suggests potential applicability across diverse healthcare settings with cultural adaptations. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.