ArticleBMC genomics2025
An audit of the PeptideAtlas database uncovers evidence for repurposed pseudogenes and co-opted retroviral ORFs.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In vivo and in silico models of Drosophila for Parkinson's disease.The FEBS journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe human genome has been the subject of scrutiny for more than two decades, yet new protein coding genes are still being uncovered. Recently ribosome profiling experiments have provided evidence for the translation of thousands of novel open reading frames (ORFs). To determine how many of these novel ORFs have peptide support, we carried out an in-depth investigation of an entire mass spectrometry proteomics database.
resultsWe analysed the peptides housed in the human build of the PeptideAtlas database and identified reliable evidence for 35 potential coding genes not annotated in the Ensembl/GENCODE reference gene set. Evidence from complementary sources confirmed that 16 were almost certainly coding genes, but we believe that at least 14 are most likely to be undergoing aberrant translation. These 14 genes had reading frames that were not preserved beyond human and their peptides were restricted to cancers or cell lines. Remarkably, three of the sixteen likely coding genes were derived from endogenous retroviral gag ORFs and were expressed only in placenta. All three had evidence of purifying selection. Retroviral env ORFs (syncytins) with distinct origins are expressed in almost all mammalian placentae and these results suggest that co-opted gag ORFs may also play an important role in placental development.
conclusionsOur analysis shows that proteomics data can be used in conjunction with evolutionary evidence to confirm the existence of new coding genes. The evidence suggests that both testis and placenta are the tissues most likely to express still to be identified coding genes, and that there may be other transposon-derived ORF that have been co-opted as coding genes. The strong evidence for the translation of regions under dysregulated conditions has important implications for the annotation of coding genes and in the analysis of cancer and other degenerative diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.