Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41272417›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025

Condensation of Force Field Parameters from Machine Learning Predicted Distributions for High-Throughput Virtual Screening Applications.

Domenico Bonanni, Yuedong Zhang, Davide Gadioli, Gianluca Scarpellini, Pietro Morerio, Alessio Del Bue, Andrea Rosario Beccari, Gianluca Palermo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Domenico BonanniDepartment of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 Coppito, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9160-0914
Yuedong ZhangDipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2588-5808
Davide GadioliDipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Gianluca ScarpelliniIstituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16163 Genova, Italy.
Pietro MorerioIstituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16163 Genova, Italy.
Alessio Del BueIstituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16163 Genova, Italy.
Andrea Rosario BeccariEXSCALATE, Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A., 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6830-2695
Gianluca PalermoDipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transferable biomolecular force fields are developed by fitting either ab initio or experimental data related to representative molecules and can then be used to model chemical entities that are similar to the ones they were developed for. However, once parametrized on a given dataset, they are difficult to refit once new chemical entities, sensing schemes, or functional forms are introduced. On the other hand, Machine Learning Force Fields (MLFF) have recently gained attention for their accuracy and ease of expanding their Applicability Domain (AD). Nonetheless, their prediction times make them incompatible with High-Throughput Virtual Screening (HTVS) requirements. In this work, we follow the inverse of the widely adopted approach with transferable force fields and propose a new condensation approach that takes advantage of machine learning algorithms to massively predict force field parameters. The generated numerical distributions are then condensed in a single value that captures in a statistical way the chemical variability of the underlying molecules sharing that specific force field parameter and giving rise to the distribution itself, improving 30× computational efficiency with limited reduction in predicted molecular geometries accuracy. When tested on the public release of the OpenFF Industry Benchmark Season 1 v1.1 dataset, the molecular structures optimized by minimizing the Potential Energy Surface built with condensed FF parameters only show a minor decrease in Root Mean Squared Deviation (RMSD) and Torsion Fingerprint Deviations (TFD) performances compared to those obtained using molecule-specific FF parameters predicted at runtime. To give more context, the original MLFF and its condensed version are evaluated with respect to several well-known transferable force fields widely used for biomolecular simulations.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID41272417
PMCPMC12690595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.