ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Condensation of Force Field Parameters from Machine Learning Predicted Distributions for High-Throughput Virtual Screening Applications.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training a force field for proteins and small molecules from scratch.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Computational Modeling of Cellulose Synthase Heterotrimer Assembly and Identification of Antimicrobial Compounds Targeting Interface Sites inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transferable biomolecular force fields are developed by fitting either ab initio or experimental data related to representative molecules and can then be used to model chemical entities that are similar to the ones they were developed for. However, once parametrized on a given dataset, they are difficult to refit once new chemical entities, sensing schemes, or functional forms are introduced. On the other hand, Machine Learning Force Fields (MLFF) have recently gained attention for their accuracy and ease of expanding their Applicability Domain (AD). Nonetheless, their prediction times make them incompatible with High-Throughput Virtual Screening (HTVS) requirements. In this work, we follow the inverse of the widely adopted approach with transferable force fields and propose a new condensation approach that takes advantage of machine learning algorithms to massively predict force field parameters. The generated numerical distributions are then condensed in a single value that captures in a statistical way the chemical variability of the underlying molecules sharing that specific force field parameter and giving rise to the distribution itself, improving 30× computational efficiency with limited reduction in predicted molecular geometries accuracy. When tested on the public release of the OpenFF Industry Benchmark Season 1 v1.1 dataset, the molecular structures optimized by minimizing the Potential Energy Surface built with condensed FF parameters only show a minor decrease in Root Mean Squared Deviation (RMSD) and Torsion Fingerprint Deviations (TFD) performances compared to those obtained using molecule-specific FF parameters predicted at runtime. To give more context, the original MLFF and its condensed version are evaluated with respect to several well-known transferable force fields widely used for biomolecular simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.