ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
Bayesian Model Averaging of Parametric Coalescent Models for Phylodynamic Inference.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bayesian phylodynamic models have become essential for reconstructing population history from genetic data, yet their accuracy depends crucially on choosing appropriate demographic models. To address uncertainty in model choice, we introduce a Bayesian model averaging (BMA) framework that integrates multiple parametric coalescent models-including constant, exponential, logistic, and Gompertz growth-along with their "expansion" variants that account for non-zero ancestral populations. Implemented in a Bayesian setting with Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo, this approach allows the sampler to switch among candidate growth functions, thereby capturing demographic histories without having to pre-specify a single model. Simulation studies verify that the logistic and Gompertz models may require specialized sampling strategies such as adaptive multivariate proposals to achieve robust mixing. We demonstrate the performance of these models on datasets simulated under different substitution models, and show that joint inference of genealogy and population parameters is well-calibrated when properly incorporating correlated-move operators and BMA. We then apply this method to two real-world datasets. Analysis of Egyptian Hepatitis C virus sequences indicates that models with a founder population followed by a rapid expansion are well supported, with a slight preference for Gompertz-like expansions. Our analysis of a metastatic colorectal cancer single-cell dataset suggests that exponential-like growth is plausible even for an advanced stage cancer patient. We believe this highlights that tumor subclones may retain substantial proliferative capacity into the later stages of the disease. Overall, our unified BMA framework reduces the need for restrictive model selection procedures and can also provide deeper biological insights into epidemic spread and tumor evolution. By systematically integrating multiple growth hypotheses within a standard Bayesian setting, this approach naturally avoids overfitting and offers a powerful tool for inferring population histories across diverse biological domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.