Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41272383›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Equilibrium state dynamics-based modeling of temporal dose delivery dependencies of FLASH skin sparing.

Till Tobias Böhlen, Veljko Grilj, Anouk Sesink, Preethi Devanand, Brita Singers Sørensen, Per Poulsen, Luca Soutter, Jean-François Germond, Claude Bailat, François Bochud and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Till Tobias BöhlenInstitute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Veljko GriljDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Anouk SesinkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Preethi DevanandDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Brita Singers SørensenDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Per PoulsenDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Luca SoutterInstitute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-François GermondInstitute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Claude BailatInstitute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
François BochudInstitute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Fernanda G HerreraInstitute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Raphaël MoeckliInstitute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5885-934X

Funding

ISREC FoundationSwiss Cancer Research Foundation KFS-6020-02-2024-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFLASH radiotherapy shows promise in sparing normal tissues while maintaining tumor control, with the magnitude of its sparing effect being strongly influenced by the temporal dose delivery (TDD) structure of ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) irradiation. Quantitatively describing these dependencies is critical for optimizing UHDR treatments and guiding preclinical and clinical applications. PURPOSE: This study introduces perturbed equilibrium state dynamics (ESD) as a minimal phenomenological framework to describe TDD dependencies of FLASH normal tissue sparing.

methodsESD-based modeling assumes a transient perturbation of a generic equilibrium state during irradiation, modulating the biological system's instantaneous radiosensitivity. Isoeffective dose ratios (FLASH-modifying factors, FMF) were derived from a collection of acute skin toxicity data, consisting of both previously published and newly acquired data, from 721 mice across 60 experimental groups irradiated with pulsed electron beams and scanned proton beams spanning various TDD patterns. Eight ESD model variants were evaluated based on their ability to reproduce experimental FMF values, optimizing their three or four free parameters and assessing goodness-of-fit metrics.

resultsThe best-ranked model based on the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) used three parameters to reproduce accurately 52 averaged FMF values (mean absolute error: 0.034, mean absolute percentage error: 4.3%). It consistently reproduces experimentally observed features of FLASH sparing in terms of FMF, including an increased sparing with dose followed by saturation at high doses. Two additional model variants received similar support by BIC, while the remaining five variants were less favored.

conclusionsESD-based modeling offers an effective framework to describe TDD dependencies of FLASH murine skin sparing while limiting complexity and number of free parameters to avoid overfitting. Through parameter tuning, the ESD modeling aligns with key experimental data, supporting its potential as a predictive, parsimonious framework for experimental and translational research. By highlighting the potential role of a transient equilibrium perturbation modulating instantaneous radiosensitivity and quantifying respective measures, ESD-based models may also guide the exploration and modeling of underlying mechanisms. While the present application is tissue-specific, the approach is broadly adaptable, with clinical translation requiring refitting and validation in other contexts.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalOrgan Sparing TreatmentsRadiation DosageSkinAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationMiceRadiotherapy DosageTime FactorsFLASHmice skin toxicitymodelingultra‐high dose rate (UHDR)

Identifiers

PMID41272383
PMCPMC12638282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.