Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41272357›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Target activation and distractor inhibition on attentional bias in priming of popout search.

Bryan R Burnham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bryan R BurnhamDepartment of Psychology, University of Scranton, Scranton, PA, 18510, USA. bryan.burnham@scranton.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3679-8785

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selection history effects occur when visual search is facilitated after previous target features are repeated during subsequent searches relative to when target features switch with non-target distractor features. Selection history on visual search is likely due to a combination of feature activation (increased salience), bias in attentional decisions over target selection, and facilitated post-selection retrieval, and likely reflects both target activation and distractor suppression. The present study used a probe detection task within a standard priming of popout (PoP) visual search task to examine how target activation and distractor suppression influence attentional decisions to select a previous target's features. PoP was observed in response times and importantly in recall of probes appearing on both color singleton targets and non-singleton distractors. Relative to baseline conditions, more probes were recalled from color singleton targets on color repeat trials, and fewer probes were recalled from targets on color switch trials; and more probes were recalled form the non-targets on switch trials than baseline trials. The results suggest that target activation and distractor suppression contribute to the attentional decision bias that arises due to selection history.

Indexed as

AttentionAttentional BiasColor PerceptionInhibition, PsychologicalOrientationPattern Recognition, VisualRepetition PrimingAdolescentAdultCuesDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallReaction TimeActivationAttentional biasFeature primingInhibitionSelection history

Identifiers

PMID41272357
PMCPMC12638352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.