Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41272340›Full record

ArticleCurrent topics in behavioral neurosciences2026

Investigating Safety Concerns and Harm Reduction in Entheogenic Churches: The Case for Community-Based Participatory Research.

Maha N Mian, Allison R Coker, Grace Kretzer, Clancy Cavnar, Jennifer M Mitchell, Brian T Anderson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maha N MianDepartment of Psychology, Suffolk University, Boston, MA, USA. maha.mian@suffolk.edu.
Allison R CokerDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Grace KretzerDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Clancy CavnarChacruna Institute for Psychedelic Plant Medicines, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jennifer M MitchellDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Brian T AndersonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alongside the important contributions of the harm reduction movement to improving public health in secular settings, communities that use psychedelics as religious sacraments (i.e., entheogens) have developed their own frameworks for supporting safety within their spiritual practices and hold their own conceptualizations of risk and harm. In order to understand better the lived realities of substance use, safety practices, and potential harms among entheogenic communities, researchers can collaborate closely with these communities in the formulation and conduct of their studies in this shared pursuit. The integration of community-based participatory research (CBPR) practices can not only help center these communities in the co-creation of research but also improve engagement, generate trust, and illuminate local priorities for knowledge production. The current work presents preliminary findings from a CBPR study with entheogenic communities. We share "lessons learned" from forming the study's community advisory board (CAB) and initial pilot data gathering in order to encourage biomedical investigators to consider CBPR approaches for their own research with psychedelic communities. Lessons include consultation with community engagement experts; considerations for compensation and confidentiality; utilizing multimodal strategies for recruiting study participants and CAB members; and the importance of considering the unique historical context of these communities. These lessons support the development of best practices for current and future psychedelic research as well as subsequent policies and public education efforts focused on psychedelic harm reduction and the community-based uses of psychedelics more broadly.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchHarm ReductionReligionSafetyStakeholder ParticipationHallucinogensHumansResearch SubjectsSpiritualityHallucinogensAyahuascaCommunity advisory boardCommunity-based participatory practicesEntheogensPsychedelicsSanto Daime

Identifiers

PMID41272340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.