ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from different donor types in primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the ALWP of the EBMT.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia (prAML) is a poor prognosis disease, with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) being the only potentially curative option. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes in 1574 adult prAML patients who underwent allo-HSCT from matched sibling donors (MSD), 10/10 or 9/10 unrelated donors (UD), or haploidentical donors between 2015 and 2020. Median follow-up was 24, 30, 38, and 24 months for MSD, UD 10/10, UD 9/10, and haploidentical transplants, respectively. MSD recipients were younger (median age 53 vs. 58-59 years in other groups, p < 0.001), had better performance status, and proceeded to transplant more quickly (3.8 months vs. >4 months in other groups, p = 0.004). In multivariate analysis, haploidentical HSCT was associated with inferior leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to other donor types. Additional negative predictors included adverse cytogenetics and longer time from diagnosis to transplant. Conversely, reduced-intensity conditioning and good performance status of the patient were associated with improved LFS. Disease progression remained the leading cause of transplant failure, underscoring the urgent need for more effective early post-transplant strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41272305What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.