Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41272259›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Effect of biochar reinforcement on the mechanical and corrosion behavior of closed-cell aluminum foams.

Ahmed Hassan, Ibrahim Abdullah Alnaser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahmed HassanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering Riyadh, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim Abdullah AlnaserDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering Riyadh, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia. ianaser@ksu.edu.sa.

Funding

Researchers Supporting Project , King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia RSPD2025R597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aluminum foam, a lightweight, energy-absorbing material with excellent thermal and mechanical properties, could be used in aerospace, automotive, and structural industries. To improve properties such as strength, wear resistance, and corrosion resistance, biochar, a sustainable resource derived from biomass pyrolysis, could be used as reinforcement. This paper reports the first use of Conocarpus biochar to reinforce closed-cell aluminum foams via the liquid metallurgy route. The aluminum foam samples were produced with different weight percentages of biochar (1 wt.%, 2 wt.%, 3 wt.%, and 4 wt.%), with fixed percentages of optimized composition from our previous study, 3% CaCO₃, 1%Al₂O₃ (AF02). This study examined mechanical and electrochemical characterization, morphology, density assessment, microhardness, and specific wear rate. In this paper, it was observed that the average pore size gradually increases when biochar is added to aluminum foam; it goes from 2.077 mm in AFB01 to 2.649 mm in AFB04 (4% biochar), a 27.5% increase. However, incorporating 4% biochar produces foam cell collapse, leading to elongated pores and collapsed struts. XRD studies show the proper distribution and intermetallic compound formation in biochar-reinforced aluminum foam. When biochar is added to aluminum foam, samples AFB01 to AFB03 have a lower relative density and higher porosity. The porosity escalates from 78.9% (AF02) to 86.74% (AFB03), whereas the relative density reduces from 21.1% (AF02) to 13.26% (AFB03). The compressive strength of foam significantly deteriorates when the concentration of biochar increases from 1 to 3%. In comparison to the base sample AF02, compressive offset stress decreases by up to 43.4% (AFB03), plateau stress decreases by 66.7% (AFB03), and energy absorption decreases by 68.8% (AFB03). The incorporation of biochar notably enhances the corrosion resistance of aluminum foam composites. Specifically, AFB01 (1% biochar) demonstrates an 88.8% improvement, while AFB03 (3% biochar) exhibits a 72.2% enhancement compared to the base sample, AF02. Conversely, the specific wear rate of AFB03 shows a deterioration of 39.7% relative to AF02. In terms of microhardness, AFB01 displays a slight increase of 5.88%, whereas AFB02 and AFB03 exhibit negligible variation when compared to AF02.

Indexed as

Aluminum foamBiocharCompressive propertiesCorrosion resistantSustainable

Identifiers

PMID41272259
PMCPMC12638843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.