ArticleScientific reports2025
Effect of metallic sealant thickness on leak arrest and composite repair performance in pipeline systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the combined effect of metallic sealant thickness and composite laminate configuration on the structural performance of pipeline repair systems. A total of 63 experiments were conducted on through-wall defects with diameters of 10.2 mm, 15.2 mm, and 25.4 mm diameters, three metallic sealant thicknesses (3.5 mm, 7 mm, and 10.5 mm) were evaluating under both dry and wet conditions. Additionally, two- and four-layer fiberglass composite overwraps were applied to assess their influence on pressure retention and energy release rate. Results showed that increasing sealant thickness significantly enhanced failure leak pressure, particularly in wet environments, where thinner sealants underperformed. The 10.5 mm thickness consistently delivered the best sealing capability across all conditions. Composite repairs improved performance further, with four-layer systems providing the highest-pressure resistance. However, only a marginal increase in interfacial energy release rate was observed, suggesting diminishing returns beyond a certain layer count. Experimental leak pressures exceeded theoretical predictions from ISO/TS 24,817, indicating the need to update current models. This research provides practical guidance for selecting optimal sealant thicknesses and laminate configurations based on defect size and environmental conditions, offering a more reliable, in-service repair solution for pipelines in the oil and gas industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.