Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41272254›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Relative eye height modulates perceived velocity of targets approaching along a horizontal plane.

Yusei Yoshimura, Tomohiro Kizuka, Seiji Ono

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yusei YoshimuraInstitute of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan. yoshimura.yusei.ka@u.tsukuba.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9610-8370
Tomohiro KizukaInstitute of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Seiji OnoInstitute of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22H03492Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24K20557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relative eye height, defined as the vertical distance between the observer's eye level and a target on the horizontal plane, provides a geometric cue to depth through the angle between eye level and the line of sight. In three-dimensional space, objects often move in depth at varying heights relative to the observer's eye level, requiring integration of multiple cues for accurate velocity judgments. However, the contribution of relative eye height to velocity perception remains unclear. This study examined how relative eye height influences perceived velocity for an approaching target moving along a horizontal plane. Participants performed a two-alternative forced-choice task in which they judged whether the current target appeared faster or slower than targets presented in previous trials, under two eye-height conditions (5 cm and 10 cm from the target level). Greater relative eye height led to faster perceived velocities and improved discrimination performance. Model comparisons further indicated that elevation angular velocity during the early phase of motion (100-400 ms post-onset), a direct cue derived from changes in elevation angle, was the key predictor of velocity judgments, suggesting that the effect of relative eye height is mediated through this cue. These findings highlight the critical role of spatial information, particularly relative eye height, in shaping motion-in-depth perception.

Indexed as

Depth PerceptionDistance PerceptionEyeMotion PerceptionSpace PerceptionAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultDepth cuesElevation angleMotion-in-depth perceptionRelative eye heightVelocity perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.