ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
Relative eye height modulates perceived velocity of targets approaching along a horizontal plane.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Relative eye height, defined as the vertical distance between the observer's eye level and a target on the horizontal plane, provides a geometric cue to depth through the angle between eye level and the line of sight. In three-dimensional space, objects often move in depth at varying heights relative to the observer's eye level, requiring integration of multiple cues for accurate velocity judgments. However, the contribution of relative eye height to velocity perception remains unclear. This study examined how relative eye height influences perceived velocity for an approaching target moving along a horizontal plane. Participants performed a two-alternative forced-choice task in which they judged whether the current target appeared faster or slower than targets presented in previous trials, under two eye-height conditions (5 cm and 10 cm from the target level). Greater relative eye height led to faster perceived velocities and improved discrimination performance. Model comparisons further indicated that elevation angular velocity during the early phase of motion (100-400 ms post-onset), a direct cue derived from changes in elevation angle, was the key predictor of velocity judgments, suggesting that the effect of relative eye height is mediated through this cue. These findings highlight the critical role of spatial information, particularly relative eye height, in shaping motion-in-depth perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41272254What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.