ArticleScientific reports2025
Fully automated detection and identification of CSF shunt valves using YOLOv8 and a class-based reference image assignment as a safety mechanism.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to develop and evaluate an algorithm based on the YOLOv8x framework to automatically detect and identify cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt valves. This approach seeks to streamline the diagnostic process identifying shunt valve types and pressure levels. A retrospective cohort of 2701 anonymized radiographs comprising six types of CSF shunt valves was used. Data augmentation techniques such as flipping, scaling, and mosaic augmentation were applied during training to enhance robustness. The dataset was split into 80% training and 20% testing subsets as part of a 5-fold cross-validation. Validation was conducted on a separate test set of 295 images using metrics such as mean Average Precision (mAP) at intersection over union thresholds of 50% (mAP50) as well as precision, recall, and F1-scores as metrics. Additionally, a class-based reference image assignment system was used to link the detected valves with the corresponding manufacturer images. These paired images were then independently reviewed by two radiologists to assess the accuracy of the algorithm's classifications. The algorithm achieved a weighted mAP50 of 0.884 and a weighted average F1-score of 94.8%. High F1-scores were observed for Codman Certas (99.6%) and Codman Hakim (99.6%), with lower scores for less common valves like proGAV (30.8%). Radiologists were able to identify both correct and incorrect classifications made by the algorithm with 100% accuracy, due to the integrated safety mechanism. This safety mechanism relies on the fully automated linking of detected valves with the corresponding manufacturer images. In Conclusion the automated system demonstrated high efficiency in detecting and classifying CSF shunt valves, significantly simplifying the diagnostic workflow. Moreover, the integration of a robust safety mechanism ensures that potential misclassifications are identified and corrected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.