ArticleScientific reports2025
Measures of the psychophysiological response to recurrent anticipatory stress - the influence of neuroticism on heart rhythm and skin resistance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Baseline normalization choices inflate classification performance in wearable health monitoring: quantification and mitigation strategies.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the risk assessment of work-related mental stress, the use of objective psychophysiological methods could improve the identification of mental stressors. However, mental stressors often reoccur during work, and adaptation processes and individual factors may alter psychophysiological responses over time. In this exploratory study, measures of heart rhythm and skin resistance during recurrent anticipatory stress were examined in two groups with lower and higher neuroticism to provide information on which method is most appropriate for stress detection. In the with-in subject design study participants were required to first anticipate a neutral audio signal during a control condition and then a potential painful electric shock in two subsequent experimental conditions. Heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), and skin resistance (SR) parameters were extracted during anticipation. Groups with lower and higher neuroticism were formed based on the Big Five Inventory. While SR parameters and the low-frequency HRV responded similarly under both electric shock conditions, the root mean square of successive time differences between heartbeats, and the high-frequency HRV did not respond. HR increased in the 1st electric shock condition in the higher neuroticism group only. Parameters that responded under both electric shock conditions may contribute to more accurately mapping of recurrent anticipatory stressors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.