ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Defining and validating a multidimensional digital metric of health states in chronic back and leg pain.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Global Prospective Observational Post-Market Study to Evaluate Long-Term Effectiveness of Neurostimulation Therapy for Pain
NAVITAS and ENVISION Study: A Study to Characterize the Relationship Between Select Objective Metrics and Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Pain Patients Treated With Boston Scientific Neurostimulation Systems
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic pain (CP) is a debilitating condition that extends beyond persistent pain, influenced by physiological and psychological factors. However, clinical trials often evaluate outcomes solely on self-reported pain amplitude. To address this, we aimed to derive a single metric from multidimensional digital data to comprehensively represent wellness in lower back and leg pain. Daily-reported data were collected for five years (>190 K samples, n = 498, from NCT01719055/NCT03240588), comprised of clinical assessments, digitally-reported symptoms, text responses, and smartwatch-based actigraphy. Clustering analysis of the digital data identified five novel symptom clusters. They were validated by comparing centroid distances to standard assessments, revealing five ordinal best-to-worst states (r = 0.34 to r = -0.51, ps < 0.001), even when pain magnitude was similar. Further, patients' text messages about their status associated better with the clusters than pain reports alone. This solution extends beyond a recapitulation of pain level, yielding non-obvious, meaningful states that serve as an actionable metric in CP care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.