ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2025
Morphological analysis of ankle joint space width.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study constructed a statistical shape model (SSM) of the full ankle joint-including the tibia, talus, calcaneus, and fibula-in healthy Chinese males and analyzed the variation patterns of joint space width (JSW). Computed tomography scans of 108 asymptomatic ankle joints were collected from healthy Chinese males and used to construct a statistical shape model based on principal component analysis. Anatomical variations were evaluated using spatial mapping and least-squares regression. The statistical shape model satisfied the validation criteria for accuracy, compactness, generalization, and specificity, and participants demonstrated high conformity in joint surface coverage and congruency. The first principal component explained more than 22% of the total variance. The minimum joint space widths for the tibiotalar, talofibular, and talocalcaneal joints ranged from 0.85 to 1.95 mm, 0.87 to 2.39 mm, and 0.90 to 3.32 mm, respectively, while the average joint space widths ranged from 2.81 to 3.35 mm, 1.36 to 3.36 mm, and 2.12 to 4.95 mm, respectively. Regression analysis showed that the first five principal modes of variation were strongly correlated with anatomical variations in ankle JSW. This study will provide theoretical support for the early diagnosis and personalized treatment of ankle joint diseases, as well as important morphological references for prosthesis design and biomechanical simulation research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41272216What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.