Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41272156›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025

Noninvasive monitoring and prediction of cell count of Saccharomyces suspensions using ultrasonic measurements and artificial neural networks.

Dominik Geier, Michael Metzenmacher, Iain Whitehead, Thomas Becker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dominik GeierChair of Brewing and Beverage Technology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephaner Steig 20, 85354, Freising, Germany. dominik.geier@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3697-3958
Michael MetzenmacherChair of Brewing and Beverage Technology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephaner Steig 20, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Iain WhiteheadChair of Brewing and Beverage Technology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephaner Steig 20, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Thomas BeckerChair of Brewing and Beverage Technology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephaner Steig 20, 85354, Freising, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie 01IF22652 N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamic nature of biological suspensions during fermentation requires continuous monitoring. In Saccharomyces suspensions, cell count directly influences biomass production and is an indicator of metabolic efficiency. However, established methods to monitor cell count require sampling, are invasive, or are restricted by detection limits. In contrast, ultrasound techniques are noninvasive and provide real-time feedback. In this study, ultrasound was used to analyze yeast suspensions with increasing concentrations (0.0-1.0 wt%) from three Saccharomyces strains, each assessed at three wort concentrations (10, 12, and 14 wt% extract). The collected analytical data, consisting of manually determined cell count and nine ultrasound-derived features, were used to develop separate artificial neural network (ANN) models for cell count prediction. Three strain-specific regression models were initially developed; their evaluation metrics confirmed that the selected ANN architecture reliably predicted cell count for each strain (R

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerSaccharomycesUltrasonicsCell CountFermentationSuspensionsSuspensionsArtificial neural networksCell countNoninvasive monitoringSaccharomycesUltrasonic measurements

Identifiers

PMID41272156
PMCPMC12680890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.