ArticleCommunications biology2025
Neural dynamics during the generation and evaluation of creative and non-creative ideas.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lower engagement of cognitive control in children on ChatGPT.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026Article
- Cognitive and neural mechanisms of mental imagery supporting creative cognition.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Dynamic switching between brain networks predicts creative ability.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Default mode network electrophysiological dynamics and causal role in creative thinking.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
What are the neural dynamics that drive creative thinking? The interaction between the executive control, default mode, and salience brain networks is an important marker of individual differences in creativity. However, how these networks might be recruited dynamically during the two key components of the creative process-generation and evaluation of ideas-remains far from understood. We applied state-of-the-art network neuroscience methodologies to examine the neural dynamics related to the generation and evaluation of creative and non-creative ideas, at the whole- and brain-networks levels. Participants completed two functional magnetic resonance imaging sessions, taking place a week apart. In the first imaging session, participants generated creative or non-creative responses to common objects. In the second session, participants evaluated their own responses to the same objects. We found different dynamic patterns of neural activity across the executive control, default mode, and salience networks, highlighting the complexity of the creative process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.