Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41272081›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparison of metaheuristic algorithms set-point tracking-based weight optimization for model predictive control.

Kawsar Nassereddine, Marek Turzynski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kawsar NassereddineFaculty of Electrical and Control Engineering, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland. nassereddinejana@gmail.com.
Marek TurzynskiFaculty of Electrical and Control Engineering, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional controllers frequently perform poorly when managing complex industrial systems because they must balance multiple goals like cost, pollution, and efficiency. For higher performance and efficiency, model predictive controller addresses this but necessitates efficient cost function tuning, which is currently frequently enhanced utilising metaheuristic algorithms. This work aims to develop and validate a data-driven weight optimisation method for multivariable model predictive controller in a DC microgrid comprising photovoltaic panels, battery, supercapacitor, grid, and load-by systematically balancing control effort and accuracy. Four algorithms-particle swarm optimization, genetic algorithm, pareto search, and pattern search-selected for their capacity to resolve complex, multi-objective problems are used in this study's automated, set-point tracking-based weight optimisation approach. The results show that incorporating parameter interdependency reduces genetic algorithm's power load tracking error from 16% to 8%, while particle swarm optimization achieves an error of under 2% even without considering interdependency. Fast convergence and trade-offs are supported by pareto and pattern search, but they are less responsive to sudden changes. These methods provide a feasible, repeatable way to boost model predictive controller performance.

Indexed as

Model predictive controlParticle swarm optimizationSensitivity analysisSet-Point trackingWeight tuning

Identifiers

PMID41272081
PMCPMC12639057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.