ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026
Environmental factors influencing hormone receptor positive breast cancer incidence: integrating chemical signatures from dust wipes with self-reported sources of exposure.
Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is a highly prevalent disease. Chemical exposures may contribute to breast cancer risk, though most chemicals to which humans are exposed remain understudied in breast cancer research.
objectiveThis study tested the hypothesis that environmental chemicals present in households of women who do and do not develop breast cancer will have differential abundance, and that chemical profiles relate to self-reported sources of exposures.
methodsHousehold dust wipe samples were collected at enrollment in the Sister Study cohort in 2003-2009. We evaluated a subsample of Sister Study participants who developed hormone receptor positive breast cancer within 10 years after enrollment (N = 40, "cases") and who remained breast cancer free during the same period (N = 40, "controls"). Dust wipes were analyzed via liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry coupled with database mining approaches. Participants self-reported personal care product usage and proximity to environmental pollution sources. Frequent itemset mining (FIM) was used to evaluate chemical occurrence and associations with questionnaire data.
resultsIn the dust wipe samples, there were 189 features annotated to potential chemicals that significantly differed (adjusted p < 0.1) in abundance between cases and controls. Example chemicals included suspected endocrine disruptors 23-(Nonylphenoxy)-3,6,9,12,15,18,21-heptaoxatricosan-1-ol, triethanolamine, and thiabendazole. Analysis of questionnaire data identified the chemical 6-benzyl-2-[bis[(2S)-2-aminopropanoyl]amino]-3-methylphenyl] (2S)-2-[[(2S)-2-(3-hydroxyhexanoylamino)-3-methylbutanoyl]amino]-3-methylbutanoate to be of high interest due to its link, derived through FIM, to 45 exposure scenarios, largely described by elevated personal care product usage habits. SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, this study builds the evidence base for understudied chemicals in everyday household environments that may alter breast cancer risk. Coupling chemical analysis results with participant survey data highlighted behaviors and environmental factors that may influence exposures to these chemicals, informing the design of future investigations to better understand sources of breast cancer risk in women. IMPACT: There is much to understand about household exposures that can affect breast cancer risk. This study aimed to generate a novel household exposomic dataset leveraging dust wipe samples from the Sister Study cohort. A subset of the detected chemicals was found to be differentially detected in the houses of women who developed breast cancer. Additional analysis of self-reported questionnaire data demonstrated linkages between increased personal care product usage and elevated chemical abundance. The results of this study lend important insights into understudied chemicals in the home that may alter breast cancer risk and possible sources of exposure to these substances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.