ArticleScientific reports2025
Optical excited states of archetypical blue light emitter, dimethyl-acridine diphenyl-sulfone derivative (DMAC-DPS) in solid films, studied by electroabsorption spectroscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detailed characterization of the lowest energy electronic excited states for dimethyl-acridine diphenyl-sulfone derivative (DMAC-DPS) in solid neat films has been performed by electroabsorption (EA) spectroscopy. The EA spectra were parametrized in the framework of Liptay theory, providing changes in the dipole moment and electronic polarizability. The extracted values of the corresponding parameters in the lowest energy optical absorption bands were assigned to molecular dipoles upon optical excitation associated with the intramolecular charge transfer (CT) from the electron-donating part (DMAC) to the electron-accepting part (DPS) of the molecule. The standard treatment of EA spectra based on Liptay theory was successfully reinterpreted applying the time-dependent density functional (TDDFT) theory, without additional assumptions regarding the shape of the EA signal, characteristic of the Liptay formalism. To correctly describe the EA spectrum, the TDDFT calculations have to be performed not for a single molecule, but for a dimer structure, established by the Monte Carlo (MC) calculations. Although the main EA features are ascribed to the excited states of intramolecular CT origin, the lowest energy excited states gain oscillator strengths due to the geometry distortion of the ground state or excited state interaction introduced by the dimer structure. The implications of these results for the first singlet excited state (S1) are discussed in the context of the thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) emitters employed currently in organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.