ArticleScientific reports2025
An integrated queuing and certainty factor theory model for efficient edge computing in remote patient monitoring systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Remote Patient Monitoring Systems (RPMS) require efficient resource management to prioritize life-critical data in latency-sensitive healthcare environments. This research introduces an Integrated Queuing and Certainty Factor Theory (IQCT) model aimed at optimizing bandwidth allocation and task scheduling within fog-edge-cloud architectures. IQCT prioritizes patient requests in real time by classifying them into emergency, warning, and normal categories using certainty factor(CF) -based urgency assessment. Simulated on Raspberry Pi fog nodes with the UCI Heart Disease dataset, its performance was benchmarked against FCFS, PQ, and WFQ using metrics such as latency, energy consumption, and response time under varying workloads. IQCT reduced latency for emergency requests by 54.5% and improved network efficiency by 30.08% compared to FCFS. It also lowered response and execution times by 49.5% and 36%, and decreased fog-layer energy consumption by 30.8%. Scalability tests confirmed stable quality of service (QoS) under peak loads, demonstrating adaptability to dynamic demand. The adaptation of PQ and CF theory can lead to more efficient and optimized performance in RPMS. The IQCT model has significantly reduced the latency by 54.5% in emergency situations, in comparison with the existing models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.