Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41272024›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Knowledge graph embedding for predicting and analyzing microbial interactions.

Mohammed Khatbane, Cécile Mangavel, Frédéric Borges, Sabeur Aridhi, Yannick Toussaint

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammed KhatbaneUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, LORIA, 54000, Nancy, France.
Cécile MangavelUniversité de Lorraine, LIBio, 54000, Nancy, France.
Frédéric BorgesUniversité de Lorraine, LIBio, 54000, Nancy, France.
Sabeur AridhiUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, LORIA, 54000, Nancy, France. sabeur.aridhi@loria.fr.
Yannick ToussaintUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, LORIA, 54000, Nancy, France.

Funding

ML4Community Project R31PNCVX
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions between microorganisms play a major role in shaping the structure and function of microbial communities, yet their prediction remains a challenge in microbial ecology. While currently available machine learning methods have shown promising performance, they often rely on extensive input features that are obtained from labor-intensive experiments. Here, we propose a new framework to predict pairwise interactions that minimizes the need for in vitro experimentation. Our approach is based on knowledge graph embedding, which learns the representation of microorganisms and their interactions in an embedding space. Using a dataset of interactions between 20 soil bacterial strains cocultured in 40 different carbon source environments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework in accurately predicting pairwise interactions. Notably, we show that our model can predict interactions involving strains with missing culture data. We additionally show that the obtained embeddings can reveal similarities between carbon source environments, enabling the prediction of interactions in one environment based on the outcomes in a similar environment between the same pair of microorganisms. Furthermore, our approach allows the design of a recommendation system that can be used to guide microbial community engineering. These findings demonstrate that knowledge graph embedding is a promising modeling strategy in microbial ecology.

Indexed as

BacteriaMicrobial InteractionsMicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyMachine LearningKnowledge graph embeddingMachine learningMicrobial ecologyMicrobial interactions

Identifiers

PMID41272024
PMCPMC12695954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.