ArticleScientific reports2025
Smartphone habits are stronger in spaces chosen out of habit.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Not all screen time is sedentary: evidence from aligned smartphone sensing and accelerometry data in adults.Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Habits are a fundamental driver of human behavior. However, prior research has largely studied habits in isolation. This study investigates spatial and smartphone habits-two cornerstone habits in contemporary society-in tandem, revealing the multiplicative ways in which habitual processes can underlie human behavior. We provide evidence that smartphone habits are stronger in habitually traveled and visited spaces. We leverage a custom-designed app that logged mobility and app use while prompting map-based questionnaires of participants' trips for two weeks (N = 419 participants; n = 27,446,977 GPS and app logs; n = 7,226 trip questionnaires). Overall, app habit strength predicted higher likelihood of app use (vs. non-use) and more app use (when used) on more habitually travelled routes and in more habitually visited destinations. The interaction between spatial and smartphone habits was most consistent for objective (vs. subjective) habit indicators. Social app habits were stronger and more context-independent than non-social app habits. Altogether, our findings reveal how distinct habitual processes can combine to shape daily behavior. Further, our method illustrates the potential of linking mobile sensing and surveying to measure habits in the real world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.