ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative study of machine learning methods for carbon metering in power generation enterprises.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In response to the global carbon neutrality imperative, power generation enterprises are under significant pressure to transform, with accurate carbon emission measurement and prediction being crucial to achieving this goal. While traditional carbon accounting methods face limitations in accuracy, adaptability, and cost, machine learning (ML) offers a promising alternative. This study focuses on a coal-fired power plant in Haikou, Hainan Province, utilizing operational data from January 1 to November 30, 2024, and selecting 18 feature parameters to develop and compare carbon emission prediction models.This study identified the key predictors through a hybrid feature selection strategy, including power generation, energy structure, operating time and load rate. The multiple linear regression, XGBoost and LSTM models are optimized through hyperparameter tuning. The prediction accuracy of the XGBoost model reaches 90.39%, demonstrating a strong ability to capture complex emission patterns. This research provides power generation enterprises with an accurate and efficient method for calculating carbon emissions, which can offer a scientific basis for their carbon management and energy conservation and emission reduction decisions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.