ArticleScientific reports2025
Using convolutional neural networks with late fusion to predict heart disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep Learning and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases are responsible for one-third of all deaths that occur globally. Machine learning and data mining have made it easier and quicker for physicians to diagnose or identify patients. This article presents a novel late fusion method over convolutional neural networks for predicting heart disease. The data was sourced from the UCI Machine Learning Repository for this research. The sample is composed of 303 instances and 13 features. This is known as the 'late fusion' deep learning technique, combining data from multiple sources to produce more accurate predictions. Thus, specialized models perform independent data analysis in this manner, and the results are aggregated to provide an extended forecast. CNNs are designed with specificity in mind to handle different kinds of data modalities. Conversely, DNNs can obtain comprehensive information and analyze tabular data. Here, we also found that our model was highly accurate in identifying heart illnesses with the help of CNNs and DNNs in an effective manner. A new hybrid architecture was designed to merge numerical features with graphics, capturing the dataset's spatial and sequential properties. The approach we adopted in our research yielded fruitful outcomes after a careful assessment of the model. The validation and testing set had zero percent error for accuracy, precision, recall, and an F1 score of 99.99%. This work's valuable contribution to the field of medical diagnostics provides a strong foundation for further exploration and simplifies the task of creating precise and extensible algorithms for predicting heart disease. Through this, patient health is enhanced, and medical data management is improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.