ArticleScientific reports2025
Adapting an emergency department fall prevention intervention for persons living with dementia through patient, caregiver, and expert interviews.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Study objective Although falls are up to three times more common in persons living with dementia (PLWD), limited fall prevention interventions exist for this population. Adapting promising interventions, such as the GAPcare intervention, which reduced fall-related ED visits by 66% and did not prolong ED length of stay, may address this need. In GAPcare patients receive pharmacy and physical therapy (PT) consultation to reduce modifiable risk factors for falls prior to ED discharge. In this qualitative descriptive study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with PLWD who recently visited the ED, their caregivers, and national experts in dementia care or ED operations to elicit perspectives on how GAPcare should be adapted for PLWD. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. We analyzed interviews using rapid qualitative analysis guided by Castro's framework for adapting prevention interventions. We interviewed 7 patients, 2 caregivers, and 15 experts (5 physicians, 3 nurses, 3 PTs, 3 pharmacists, 1 PhD scientist). Participants strongly supported improved ED falls care for PLWD. They also indicated that tailoring at multiple levels (patient and caregiver, ED, and external factors, e.g., insurance status) would be required to support the complexities in PLWDs' circumstances (e.g., living arrangements, income) and cognitive abilities. Participants suggested training of ED staff in dementia care and caregiver support. PLWD, caregivers, and experts in dementia care and ED operations are supportive of adapting our existing GAPcare intervention for PLWD. Early feedback from relevant informants guided GAPcareAD intervention refinement and fit with ED workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.