ArticleScientific reports2025
Identifying key clinical and biochemical predictors of treatment outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease: a real-world evidence study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Treatment Response to Vitamin DBiomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease and Ulcerative colitis, often shows variable responses to biological therapies. Identifying the most significant variables for predicting the response to these therapies could help prioritize efforts in data collection and preprocessing. This study evaluated the predictive performance of machine learning models in forecasting remission and response to vedolizumab and ustekinumab in the treatment of IBD. The goal was not to compare the two therapies, but rather to identify the variables most influential in predicting response for each treatment. Data from 227 IBD patients treated at Virgen Macarena University Hospital (2015-2022) were analyzed. Clinical, demographic, and laboratory variables were used to develop Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models to predict the clinical response at 26 and 52 weeks and remission at 52 weeks. Model performance was evaluated via F1 scores, accuracy, precision, and recall, with fairness analyses across sex and age groups. The models achieved F1 scores of 0.842, 0.869, and 0.649, respectively. The predictors included leukocyte count, FCP, CRP, and vitamin B12 levels, with higher inflammatory marker levels linked to poorer responses. Demographic subgroup analysis revealed variability in model performance due to small sample sizes. Machine learning models have potential as clinical decision support tools for personalizing IBD treatment. These findings underscore the value of leveraging real-world evidence in optimizing therapeutic strategies. Further multicenter studies are needed to validate these models and enhance their applicability across diverse populations. Taken together, these findings arise from an exploratory, hypothesis-generating study that constitutes an early step toward truly personalized biologic therapy in IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.