ArticleScientific reports2025
Healthcare utilization and costs after cranial epilepsy surgery and vagus nerve stimulation in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy: a nationwide cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) affects 30-40% of children with epilepsy, resulting in medical costs significantly higher than those of controlled epilepsy. Cranial epilepsy surgery (CES) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) are key interventions; however, their long-term economic impact remains ambiguous. Using South Korea's National Health Insurance claims data (2007-2022), we examined healthcare utilization and costs among children with DRE treated with antiseizure medications (ASM) only, CES, or VNS. Of the cohort included 6020 patients, of whom 5407 (89.8%) received ASM-only treatment, 396 (6.6%) underwent CES, and 217 (3.6%) received VNS. Post-CES, emergency department (ED) visits declined by 65%, overall length of stay (LOS) by 45%, epilepsy-specific admissions by 49% and epilepsy-specific LOS by 83%. Interrupted time series analysis revealed a sustained monthly reduction in total costs, consistent with fewer high-risk encounters. Post-VNS, ED visits fell by 41%, admissions by 39%, and LOS by 44%, with reductions in epilepsy-related admissions; however, outpatient visits remained unchanged. Both CES and VNS significantly reduce acute-care needs in pediatric DRE. CES yields the greatest and most durable benefits, while VNS shifts care from emergency and inpatient settings to scheduled outpatient follow-up, offering a valuable alternative when surgery is not feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.