ArticleScientific reports2025
Introduction to electrocardiogram signal quality assessment and estimated accuracy for textile electrodes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Design of Electrodes and Interfaces for Non-Contact and Capacitive Biomedical Measurements: Terminology, Electrical Model, and System Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- High-Reliability Signal Quality Validation for Biosignals Using Sensor Fusion and Software Indices.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Monitoring military pilots with textile sensors: physiological responses and signal quality under extreme conditions.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the use of wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) data for modeling purposes continues to rise, there is a pressing need for signal quality assessment (SQA) algorithms capable of identifying segments of signal from which reliable data can be obtained. Manually annotated ECG data, obtained through expert visual inspection, is often used as reference in the development of ECG SQA algorithms. In this approach, the quality of a signal segment is assessed based on the level of noise present. Yet, the data extracted from noise-corrupted ECG signal segments might still be of sufficient accuracy depending on the target application. The current work proposes a paradigm shift by presenting a SQA algorithm that performs template matching and physiological feasibility checks to determine the quality of ECG signals acquired by textile-based wearable systems. Signal segments were classified into four different quality classes based on the estimated accuracy of RR intervals extracted from the signal segments of each class. Our findings show that the proposed SQA algorithm is effective in identifying ECG signal segments from which accurate RR intervals can be derived, and that the proportion of the data across the different classes is sensitive to different factors known to have an effect on signal quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.