ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of deep learning-based retinal pigment epithelium segmentation for a widely used optical coherence tomography device.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop our proposed technology method to improve retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) detection in optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and compare its efficacy with Topcon's automated segmentation algorithm across multiple retinal diseases and healthy eyes. OCT images from 88 patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) were used for our proposed technology model training and validation. For testing with separate images were obtained from patients with AMD (100), diabetic retinopathy (DR; 50), epiretinal membrane (ERM; 50), branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO; 50), and healthy eyes (50). The proposed technology was used to identify RPE in OCT images using the Pyramid Scene Parsing Network on top of ResNet-50. The accuracy of the proposed technology method in RPE detection was measured using the mean absolute error (MAE) and compared with Topcon's automated segmentation algorithm for each retinal condition. As compared with Topcon's automated segmentation algorithm, the proposed technology showed significantly better MAEs across all conditions: AMD (2.18 vs. 4.79), DR (1.69 vs. 3.17), ERM (1.50 vs. 2.67), BRVO (1.86 vs. 2.98), and healthy eyes (1.59 vs. 2.28). Notably, the proposed technology's superiority was most evident in the AMD group. The proposed technology method outperformed Topcon's automated segmentation algorithm in accurately visualizing RPE in OCT images across all tested conditions, especially in AMD. Our results indicate the proposed technology's potential to elevate the RPE segmentation which can lead to enhancing ophthalmology care by providing more accurate OCT imaging analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.