ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhancing psychological resilience and decision-making in basketball players through emerging technologies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Opponent Knowledge and Competitive Level on the Cognitive Processes of Decision-Making in High School Kendo Athletes: An Exploratory Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Decision-making performance and motor skill consistency in basketball short pass-shot sequences under different levels of mental fatigue: an integrated psychophysiological dynamics analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The combination of sports psychology and new wearable technology is allowing experts to assess psychological and cognitive performance in elite basketball more accurately. This study investigates the application of Human Activity Recognition (HAR) using wrist-worn inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors to infer psychological resilience and decision-making quality in basketball players. We utilized the Hang-Time HAR dataset comprising 24 participants across structured drills and unstructured game scenarios, extracting temporal, spatial, and frequency-domain features from accelerometer data. Machine learning models, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting, were employed to classify psychological states. Findings indicated that resilience and decision-making accuracies under stratified five-fold cross-validation were 84.7% (95% CI: 81.2788.1) and 78.3% (95% CI: 74.6782.0), respectively. To mitigate the risk of data leakage, a leave-one-subject-out validation was conducted, resulting in high accuracies of 79.4 and 73.1, respectively. The significance of the observed differences was confirmed by statistical analyses (post-hoc tests, effect sizes). In comparison with the current research in HAR and basketball, which is mainly dedicated to the technical capabilities or activity recognition, this study is the first one to combine IMU-based sensing with psychological state inference. The results demonstrate the potential of wearable movement analytics to provide real-time, ecologically valid measurements of cognitive-psychological variables in sport, to inform the monitoring of players, the customization of training, and the study of sports psychology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.