ArticleScientific reports2025
Unprecedented social-ecological impacts of the 2023 extreme drought in the central Amazon.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While the 2023 record-breaking drought led to widespread social-ecological impacts across Amazonia, local impacts of such extreme events are rarely described in detail. Here we leverage a large interdisciplinary data collection related to social and ecological impacts in the Central Amazon. Compound hazards (reduced river water levels, lack of rainfall, high water/air temperatures, river erosion and fire smoke) led to major impacts, including an unprecedented mortality of 209 river dolphins and blooms of the potentially ichthyotoxic Euglena sanguinea phytoplankton. Fish kills in lakes and changes in caiman relative abundance along floodplain channels were observed, as well as lower-than-usual production of flowers and fruits in floodplain trees. Impaired river transportation was the main socio-economic impact, affecting important value chains such as the arapaima fisheries and manioc flour production, as well as access to healthcare, drinking water and urban markets. Our results also show the contrasting impacts between rural and urban populations, with the latter presenting a higher resilience throughout the event. Continuous records of impacts like those presented here are fundamental to guide future disaster management policies in Amazonia. This is particularly important to help vulnerable remote people and ecosystems during extreme hydro-climatic events, which are likely to increase in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.