Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41271896›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The relationship between CTCs, TFD and postoperative prognosis of cervical cancer patients and the construction of prediction models.

Zhonggang Zhang, Bing Li, Wenlei Li, Zhenlu Wang, Qingqing Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhonggang Zhang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Fourth People's Hospital of Jinan, Shandong Second Medical University, Jinan, China.
Bing Li *Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Wenlei LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Fourth People's Hospital of Jinan, Shandong Second Medical University, Jinan, China.
Zhenlu WangDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China. Wzl123456@126.com.
Qingqing YuPKUCare Luzhong Hospital, Zibo, China. yuqingqing2013@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop a postoperative recurrence/metastasis risk prediction model for cervical cancer based on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and tumor fibrosis distance (TFD), and to validate its biological mechanisms through animal experiments. This model aims to guide preoperative risk stratification and personalized treatment strategies. A total of 148 patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer who underwent radical surgery between 2020 and 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Preoperative CTC counts, TFD measurements, and clinicopathological data were collected. Independent prognostic factors were identified using Cox regression analysis. The model's performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and risk stratification was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Additionally, an orthotopic tumor model was established in 60 Sprague-Dawley rats divided into six groups (Control, Model, HTFD, LTFD, HCTCs, and LH). Tumor burden, CD4+/CD8 + ratios, IL-6, TNF-α, MDA, and SOD levels were measured to explore the model's underlying metabolic and immune mechanisms. Patients with poor outcomes had significantly higher CTC counts (30.50 vs. 23.74/5 mL, P < 0.001) and lower TFD values (5.47 vs. 5.98 mm, P < 0.001). CTCs ≥ 28/5 mL (OR = 6.63) and TFD ≤ 5.7 mm (OR = 3.37) were identified as independent predictors of poor prognosis. The combined model yielded an AUC of 0.91, with a sensitivity of 90.6%, specificity of 84.5%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.7%. Patients were stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, with corresponding clinical management recommendations. In high-risk rat groups, elevated CTC release, reduced CD4+/CD8 + ratios, increased IL-6 and TNF-α levels, and significant oxidative damage were observed, supporting the biological plausibility of the clinical model. Unlike conventional models that mainly rely on clinicopathological features, our model incorporates both CTCs and TFD, providing superior discrimination for recurrence risk and offering a novel integrative approach for postoperative surveillance. This dual validation underscores the translational potential of the model, which may be incorporated into individualized postoperative monitoring strategies and multidisciplinary decision-making.

Indexed as

Neoplastic Cells, CirculatingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRetrospective StudiesROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorCervical cancerCirculating tumor cells (CTCs)Recurrence and metastasisRisk modelTumor fibrosis distance (TFD)

Identifiers

PMID41271896
PMCPMC12639054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.