Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41271871›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Research on bearing fault diagnosis based on machine learning and SHAP interpretability analysis.

Lulu Wang, Menghua Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lulu WangGuangdong University of Science and Technology, Dongguan, 523668, China.
Menghua WuGuangdong University of Science and Technology, Dongguan, 523668, China. 3571088894@qq.com.

Funding

Education Department of Guangdong Province 2023ZDZX3048Guangdong University of Science and Technology GKZLGC2023159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bearing faults are the most common type of failures in rotating machinery, accounting for approximately 30%-40% of total failures and posing serious threats to industrial production safety and economic efficiency. Traditional diagnostic methods based on physical models and empirical thresholds suffer from poor adaptability and low accuracy, while existing machine learning methods lack interpretability in their decision-making processes, limiting their application and promotion in industrial settings. This research proposes an integrated bearing fault diagnosis method combining multiple machine learning algorithms with SHAP interpretability analysis. A comprehensive experimental platform was constructed, including motors, couplings, loading systems and high-precision data acquisition systems, collecting vibration signals from normal and faulty bearings at a sampling frequency of 25.6 kHz. Raw signals were preprocessed using sliding window techniques and 15 key features covering time-domain, frequency-domain, and statistical characteristics were extracted, forming a comprehensive multi-domain fusion feature system. Ten representative machine learning algorithms (including LogReg, SVM, KNN, DT, RF, AdaBoost, GBoost, XGBoost, LGBM and NB) were systematically compared and analyzed, with comprehensive evaluation using multi-dimensional metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC AUC and log loss. Experimental results show that the XGBoost model performed optimally, achieving 91.0% accuracy, 91.9% precision, 98.9% recall, 95.3% F1-score and 62.7% ROC AUC. Multiple models achieved 100% recall, effectively avoiding fault omission. SHAP technology was systematically applied to interpretability analysis in bearing fault diagnosis, revealing that spectral_entropy, rms and impulse_factor are the most important features influencing diagnostic decisions, with their importance ranking highly consistent with the physical mechanisms of bearing faults. SHAP analysis not only provides transparent interpretation of model decisions but also offers scientific basis for feature engineering optimization and industrial applications. This research provides a complete, efficient and interpretable intelligent diagnostic solution for bearing fault diagnosis, with significant implications for advancing predictive maintenance technology development.

Indexed as

Bearing fault diagnosisFeature engineeringMachine learningPredictive maintenanceSHAP interpretabilityVibration signal analysis

Identifiers

PMID41271871
PMCPMC12639068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.