ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on bearing fault diagnosis based on machine learning and SHAP interpretability analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Rotating Machinery Fault Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review and Emerging Trends.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Two-Stage Interpretable Fault Diagnosis Approach for Bearings Based on EBM.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From Pixel Understanding to Semantic Insight: Intelligent Detection in Sensor-Driven Perception Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multi-Source Aero-Engine Fault Diagnosis Using Explainable Boosted Tree with Spatiotemporal Attention and Adaptive Feature Selection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multi-scale entropy analysis of acoustic emission for gearbox fault severity classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bearing faults are the most common type of failures in rotating machinery, accounting for approximately 30%-40% of total failures and posing serious threats to industrial production safety and economic efficiency. Traditional diagnostic methods based on physical models and empirical thresholds suffer from poor adaptability and low accuracy, while existing machine learning methods lack interpretability in their decision-making processes, limiting their application and promotion in industrial settings. This research proposes an integrated bearing fault diagnosis method combining multiple machine learning algorithms with SHAP interpretability analysis. A comprehensive experimental platform was constructed, including motors, couplings, loading systems and high-precision data acquisition systems, collecting vibration signals from normal and faulty bearings at a sampling frequency of 25.6 kHz. Raw signals were preprocessed using sliding window techniques and 15 key features covering time-domain, frequency-domain, and statistical characteristics were extracted, forming a comprehensive multi-domain fusion feature system. Ten representative machine learning algorithms (including LogReg, SVM, KNN, DT, RF, AdaBoost, GBoost, XGBoost, LGBM and NB) were systematically compared and analyzed, with comprehensive evaluation using multi-dimensional metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC AUC and log loss. Experimental results show that the XGBoost model performed optimally, achieving 91.0% accuracy, 91.9% precision, 98.9% recall, 95.3% F1-score and 62.7% ROC AUC. Multiple models achieved 100% recall, effectively avoiding fault omission. SHAP technology was systematically applied to interpretability analysis in bearing fault diagnosis, revealing that spectral_entropy, rms and impulse_factor are the most important features influencing diagnostic decisions, with their importance ranking highly consistent with the physical mechanisms of bearing faults. SHAP analysis not only provides transparent interpretation of model decisions but also offers scientific basis for feature engineering optimization and industrial applications. This research provides a complete, efficient and interpretable intelligent diagnostic solution for bearing fault diagnosis, with significant implications for advancing predictive maintenance technology development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.