ArticleScientific reports2025
Functional connectivity between non-motor and motor networks predicts motor recovery changes after stroke.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of virtual reality exercise on motor function, balance and gait function, and cognitive function in stroke patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Pooled it
- Closed-loop brain-computer interfaces for post-stroke sensorimotor loop restoration.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke impairs limb motor function, which affects patients' quality of life and imposes economic burdens. Early prediction of motor recovery is essential for guiding treatment and rehabilitation. While the corticospinal tract is a known biomarker, the role of non-motor brain regions remains under explored. Fifty-five stroke patients with unilateral subcortical lesions and 49 healthy controls underwent resting-state functional MRI scans at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after stroke. Focusing on two motor and 15 non-motor networks defined by the Schaefer atlas, machine learning models were used to predict changes in motor function measured by the Fugl-Meyer assessment using functional connectivity (FC) data. The network-based statistic (NBS) method was used to identify significant FC differences between patients and controls. Among 90 predictive models tested, only the model based on FC within the Somatomotor A (SomMotA) and Control A (ContA) networks at 1 week after stroke significantly predicted motor recovery from the acute to subacute phases (p = 0.00040 after Bonferroni correction). The ContA network contributed more to the prediction than the SomMotA network did. NBS analysis revealed significant FC alterations within the SomMotA network in patients versus controls but no direct correlation between predictive FC and group differences. This study revealed acute-phase FC between the non-motor ContA and motor SomMotA networks can be used to effectively predict motor recovery in stroke patients. These findings highlight the significant role of non-motor networks in motor recovery and suggest that rehabilitation strategies incorporating non-motor interventions may improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.