Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41271861›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Functional connectivity between non-motor and motor networks predicts motor recovery changes after stroke.

Yi Zhang, Gaolang Gong, Gang Liu, Songbai Xu, Jinsheng Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yi ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Gaolang GongState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
Gang LiuDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Neurological Diseases, National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, Guangzhou, China. liug26@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Songbai XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China. xusongbai@jlu.edu.cn.
Jinsheng ZengDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Neurological Diseases, National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, Guangzhou, China. zengjs@pub.guangzhou.gd.cn.

Funding

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Neurological Diseases 2020B1212060017National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271300 and 82471258Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2023A1515012739Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou 2023B03J0466Southern China International Cooperation Base for Early Intervention and Functional Rehabilitation of Neurological Diseases 2015B050501003 and 2020A0505020004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke impairs limb motor function, which affects patients' quality of life and imposes economic burdens. Early prediction of motor recovery is essential for guiding treatment and rehabilitation. While the corticospinal tract is a known biomarker, the role of non-motor brain regions remains under explored. Fifty-five stroke patients with unilateral subcortical lesions and 49 healthy controls underwent resting-state functional MRI scans at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after stroke. Focusing on two motor and 15 non-motor networks defined by the Schaefer atlas, machine learning models were used to predict changes in motor function measured by the Fugl-Meyer assessment using functional connectivity (FC) data. The network-based statistic (NBS) method was used to identify significant FC differences between patients and controls. Among 90 predictive models tested, only the model based on FC within the Somatomotor A (SomMotA) and Control A (ContA) networks at 1 week after stroke significantly predicted motor recovery from the acute to subacute phases (p = 0.00040 after Bonferroni correction). The ContA network contributed more to the prediction than the SomMotA network did. NBS analysis revealed significant FC alterations within the SomMotA network in patients versus controls but no direct correlation between predictive FC and group differences. This study revealed acute-phase FC between the non-motor ContA and motor SomMotA networks can be used to effectively predict motor recovery in stroke patients. These findings highlight the significant role of non-motor networks in motor recovery and suggest that rehabilitation strategies incorporating non-motor interventions may improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

BrainNerve NetRecovery of FunctionStrokeAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedStroke RehabilitationFunctional connectivityMotor brain networkMotor function recoveryNon-motor brain networkResting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI)Stroke

Identifiers

PMID41271861
PMCPMC12638762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.