Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41271839›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep learning approaches for predicting solar radiation and freshwater yield in modified pyramid solar still.

Sevda Allahyari, S M Hosseinalipour, Sasan Asiaei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sevda AllahyariSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
S M HosseinalipourSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran. alipour@iust.ac.ir.
Sasan AsiaeiSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran. asiaei@iust.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water deficiency is a significant globally challenge that requires the advancement of sustainable and effective desalination methods. Solar stills provide a feasible solution for the production of fresh water in areas dealing with water limitations, particularly in remote locations. However, their efficacy is frequently limited by fluctuating climatic conditions. The intermittent and changing character of solar radiation imposes significant limitations on most applications. Accurate solar radiation forecasting is crucial for estimating the distillate yield of a solar still system. With computer technology developing so quickly, a growing many deep learning models are employed in solar radiation prediction. For this purpose, the article evaluates the freshwater yield of the modified pyramid solar still in Tehran and Zahedan, Iran. Utilizing monthly data from 1984 to 2023 and employing Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and CNN-LSTM algorithms, predictions for solar irradiance and temperature are calculated for the next ten years. The results validated the better performance of the CNN and GRU models for Tehran, while the LSTM model succeeded for Zahedan in forecasting global solar irradiance (GHI) and temperature. The presented models are utilized for predict the monthly output of the studied solar stills. The predicted average annual freshwater yield for the ten years from 2024 to 2033 is calculated to be 2630 L in Tehran and 2710 L in Zahedan.

Indexed as

Deep learningLong-term predictionProductivity ForecastingPyramidal solar stillSolar radiation

Identifiers

PMID41271839
PMCPMC12639112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.