Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41271834›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Hybrid intelligence in medical image segmentation.

Namia Mohamed Ali, Solomon Sunday Oyelere, Nitya Jitani, Rosy Sarmah, Simon Andrew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Namia Mohamed AliDepartment of Computer Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4RN, UK.
Solomon Sunday OyelereDepartment of Computer Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4RN, UK. S.Oyelere@exeter.ac.uk.
Nitya JitaniDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Tezpur University, Assam, India.
Rosy SarmahDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Tezpur University, Assam, India.
Simon AndrewDepartment of Health and Care Professions, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4RN, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical image segmentation is vital for precise identification and analysis of anatomical structures and pathological regions, yet traditional models often fall short in aligning with clinical workflows, requiring extensive manual correction even when overall segmentation accuracy is high. To address this gap, we introduce HybridMS, a hybrid intelligence framework designed to maintain high segmentation accuracy while substantially reducing clinician workload through selective human intervention. HybridMS employs an uncertainty-driven feedback mechanism that selectively triggers clinician input only for cases predicted to be challenging, thereby avoiding unnecessary manual review. Corrected cases are prioritised during retraining through a weighted update strategy, enabling the model to adapt more effectively to clinically relevant errors. This design minimises intervention frequency while preserving segmentation quality. Evaluated on lung segmentation in chest X-rays for tuberculosis detection, HybridMS achieved comparable or improved performance over the baseline MedSAM model (Dice: 0.9538 vs. 0.9435; IoU: 0.9126 vs. 0.8941) with consistent boundary quality in difficult cases. For the subset of cases identified as challenging (baseline Dice < 0.92), HybridMS reduced mean Hausdorff Distance and Average Symmetric Surface Distance, demonstrating more stable anatomical boundaries. Workflow efficiency was markedly improved: in a preliminary timing study with radiologists, average annotation time was reduced by approximately 82% for standard cases and 60% for challenging cases, without compromising accuracy. By combining targeted human oversight with automated refinement, HybridMS demonstrates that stable segmentation performance can be achieved with significantly lower annotation effort, offering a clinically viable pathway for efficient and reliable deployment in diagnostic workflows.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumansLungTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID41271834
PMCPMC12639002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.